Moderators: Bob Miller, AronSchH3, sch3dana, annecamper
David Feliciano wrote:http://www.tmuscle.com/free_online_article/sports_body_training_performance_investigative/the_truth_about_crossfit
Gunny wrote:David Feliciano wrote:http://www.tmuscle.com/free_online_article/sports_body_training_performance_investigative/the_truth_about_crossfit
Crossfit style programs are going to be the wave of the future.

Gunny wrote:The difference with functionally based programs like Crossfit and jazzercise or tai bo.. Is they are rooted in the idea that they actually improve the kinetic movement of the body, for utilitarian uses. Such as pulling ones own body weight up, or explosively lifting something off the ground to above the head. or being able to sprint a 1/4 mile then have to do it again in few short moments...or even a combo there of.
The program has not been advertised on T.V., is more than a decade old. There is no need to debate it. Try a functional program. Does not even need to be crossfit. The proof is in the results.
I know that the wave of the future comment may have sounded silly....But mark my words. The gyms full of weights and treadmills are going to be replaced by gyms with lots of space, minimal free weights and a bunch of random equipment. Even in the current fitness world the buzz word is "core strength" this is something most athletes have known for a long time. but some how it has taken a long time to get to the public level. Why is core important? because it's functional, because it provides the base for all other movement. the more stable your core, the more likely you will get stronger, faster in all other parts of your body and keep yourself healthy.
Jazzercise and tai bo is rooted in popular culuture of thier time. Functional training is rooted in the fact that it makes better atheletes and provides more complete fitness.
David Feliciano wrote:
Gunny, I have tried several different functional programs.(much better than crossfit) This type of training is nothing new.
AronSchH3 wrote:That second video looks like 80-90% the same exercises you see in Crossfit.
Gunny wrote:And with that David...I will not respond nor acknowledge any of your future posts. I think Chris is really doing his Job when responds to me, whether I like how he is doing it or not....You just post to try and get a rise, and you for some reason you like guys from Southern California for this.
Gunny wrote:I am familiar with Defranco's Gym. Crossfit and Defranco...Are different programs rooted with different goals. Defranco is specific atheletic training, although thier exercises are functionally based...they are sports specific. Meaning that they are meant to improve the athelete in a specific movement or ability. Like tackling, running or throwing a football. Like getting you ready to be a better football player. Or making you stronger. They use the method of periodization. This encompasses the idea that working on specific abilities for pre-determinded peroids of time. Then moving on to the next period. So it would look like focusing on hypotrophy for a few weeks to build muscle, then strength to make the mass stronger, then power...converting strength into a specific movement, like jumping on those super high boxes. Then moving to training endurance. then you go to your season, or competetion...going on a manitence program that encompasses all the phases in short periods of time, while you are in your season or in the upcoming weeks to your competetion. This works great for football players, or someone getting ready for a test of some sort, like a police officer trying to get to pass a PRT.
Crossfit is non-sports or activity specific. They do not follow the periodization theory. They mingle all the phases. Trying to produce an athlete for something like boxing, or police officer training for the day to day job. This works better for people with no off season. This program is not meant to train the athlete to get better any one specific ability. But to improve the athletes overall fitness. Thier speciality is not having a speciality.

Gunny wrote:Ahh you got me!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest